BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 25d · Stage 3vsBMW X1 (F48) 25d · Stage 2vsBMW X1 (F48) 25d · Stage 1vsBMW X1 (F48) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
25d (Stage 2)
BMW X1 (F48)
25d (Stage 1)
BMW X1 (F48)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed277 km/h172 mph
- Most powerful358 hp267 kW
- Highest torque720 Nm531 lb-ft
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 358hp267kW+127 hp | 312hp233kW+81 hp | 277hp207kW+46 hp | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 720Nm531lb-ft+270 Nm | 630Nm465lb-ft+180 Nm | 563Nm415lb-ft+113 Nm | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 277 km/h 172 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.5s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph-12.5 s Calculated | 62.1s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph-7.9 s Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph-4.4 s Calculated | 70.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s-1.6 s | 5.5s-1.1 s | 5.9s-0.7 s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s-11.1 s Calculated | 17.6s-8.6 s Calculated | 20.2s-5.9 s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s-1.5 s Calculated | 5.2s-1.1 s Calculated | 5.6s-0.7 s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s-1.7 s Calculated | 13.5s-1.2 s Calculated | 13.9s-0.7 s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 198hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 457Nm/t306lb-ft/ton Calculated | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,439mm175in | 4,439mm175in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,821mm72in | 1,821mm72in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,598mm63in | 1,598mm63in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 183mm7in | 183mm7in | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,550L | 1,550L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 137g/km | 137g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 2) 312 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 1) 277 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 25d 231 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 17.6 s | 20.2 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 277 km/h 172 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.4 s | 11.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s | 13.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 358 hp 267 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 277 hp 207 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp has 127 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25d 231 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d 231 hp and BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp: 127 hp (95 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 563 Nm 415 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 5.0 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 5.5 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 5.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp and BMW X1 (F48) 25d 231 hp: 1.6 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 2) 312 hp and BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 1) 277 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 981 km 609 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 981 km 609 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 981 km 609 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 358 hp 267 kW | 5.0 s | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 312 hp 233 kW | 5.5 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 277 hp 207 kW | 5.9 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 3)358 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 2)312 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d (Stage 1)277 hp | BMWX1 (F48)25d231 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 358 hp 267 kW | 312 hp 233 kW | 277 hp 207 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 563 Nm 415 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 277 km/h 172 mph | 264 km/h 164 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 981 km 609 mi | 981 km 609 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 137 g/km | 137 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 198 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp | BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 2) 312 hp | BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 1) 277 hp | BMW X1 (F48) 25d 231 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 3) 358 hp
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X1 (F48) 25d (Stage 2) 312 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























