BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20ivsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best estimated range850 km528 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,065kg4,553lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.0s Calculated | 33.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 850km528mi Calculated | 810km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20i: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.0 s | 33.6 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and BMW X1 (F48) 20i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 850 km 528 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 810 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.6 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20i | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20i | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 850 km 528 mi | 810 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20i | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20i
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























