BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 28ivsBMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70)
3.0sd
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,670 kg3,682 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,037 km644 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 81.8s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 40.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 863km536mi Calculated | 1,037km644mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,477mm176in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,576mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,576mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 40.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd has 41 hp more than BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 6.4 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 7.0 s |
Although BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd has more power, BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 863 km 536 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 1,037 km 644 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.0 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX5 (E70)3.0sd | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 2,185 kg 4,817 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 863 km 536 mi | 1,037 km 644 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i | BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Is 515 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sd
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























