Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250vsBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk421 L
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 848km527mi Calculated | 1,109km689mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,417mm174in | 4,477mm176in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,529mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,425L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250 and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 7.1 s |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 848 km 527 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 1,109 km 689 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 848 km 527 mi | 1,109 km 689 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250 | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 25d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 261 km (162 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























