Car comparison

BMW X1 (E84) 28ivsNissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (E84)

28i

245 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2011-2012
VS

Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010

3.5 V6

249 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (E84) 28i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    797 km
    496 mi
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (E84)28iNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
245hp183kW
249hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
334Nm246lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,830kg4,034lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,365kg5,214lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
91.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
25.1s
Calculated
41.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
797km496mi
Calculated
774km481mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,454mm175in
4,860mm191in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,885mm74in
Height
1,545mm61in
1,720mm68in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,825mm111in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,529mm60in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
178mm7in
Trunk volume
420L
402L
Max trunk volume
1,350L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
82L
CO2 emissions-
248g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (E84) 28iNissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (E84) 28i: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (E84)28i5,000-6,500 rpm1,250-4,800 rpm6,750 rpm
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V66,000 rpm4,400 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (E84)28iNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.1 s
41.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
245 hp
183 kW
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
249 hp
186 kW

Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has 4 hp more than BMW X1 (E84) 28i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
334 Nm
246 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
1,830 kg
4,034 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
240 km/h
149 mph
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i6.5 s
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V68.0 s

Although Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has more power, BMW X1 (E84) 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)28i
797 km
496 mi
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
774 km
481 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (E84)28i
245 hp
183 kW
6.5 s
240 km/h
149 mph
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
249 hp
186 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (E84)28i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (E84)28i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
249 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

BMW X1 (E84) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (E84)28i
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.5 s
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (E84)28i
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (E84)28iNissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6
Power
245 hp
183 kW
249 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
334 Nm
246 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
8.0 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,860 mm
191.3 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Range score
797 km
496 mi
774 km
481 mi
CO2 score
-
248 g/km
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (E84) 28iNissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (E84) 28i

  • Has 16 Nm more
  • Is 235 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 18 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
3.5 V6
3.5
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsNissanMurano II (Z51)3.5
28i
25i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX1 (F48)25i
3.5 V6
2.5 Turbo
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
28i
23i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX1 (U11)23i
3.5 V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TDI V6
28i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX3 (F25)28i
3.5 V6
2.0
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsSubaruForester IV2.0
28i
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
28i
40d
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d
3.5 V6
GL 350 BlueTEC
VS
NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 350 BlueTEC
28i
35i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)28ivsBMWX6 (E71)35i
BMW X1 (E84) 28i vs Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster