BMW X1 (E84)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84) 28ivsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84)28i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 29.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 670km416mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,454mm175in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84) 28i: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84)28i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d has 48 hp more than BMW X1 (E84) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 28i and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 670 km 416 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84)28i | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 670 km 416 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84) 28i | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Is 500 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 290 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 463 km (288 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























