BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 28ivsBMW X1 (E84) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range808 km502 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score80/100
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 808km502mi Calculated | 670km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,477mm176in | 4,454mm175in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 182g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6,600 rpm | 2,600-3,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW |
BMW X1 (E84) 28i has 13 hp more than BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 6.1 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 6.8 s |
Although BMW X1 (E84) 28i has more power, BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X1 (E84) 28i: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 808 km 502 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 670 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)28i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)28i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX1 (E84)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 808 km 502 mi | 670 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 182 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i | BMW X1 (E84) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 137 km (85 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW X1 (E84) 28i
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























