BMW X1 (E84)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84) 25ivsSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range677 km421 mi
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score82/100
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,571 kg3,463 lb
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84)25i | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,571kg3,463lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,191kg4,830lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.5s Calculated | 41.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 638km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,454mm175in | 4,493mm177in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,788mm70in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,622mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,576mm101in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,527mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 194mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84) 25i: Power / Torque
- Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 6,100 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84)25i | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.5 s | 41.9 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 218 hp 163 kW |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
BMW X1 (E84) 25i has 18 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 7.9 s |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
Although BMW X1 (E84) 25i has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI and BMW X1 (E84) 25i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 677 km 421 mi |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 638 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84) 25i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84)25i | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84)25i | SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 638 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84) 25i | Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84) 25i
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI
- Is 29 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























