Subaru Forester II
Car comparison
Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V TurbovsBMW X1 (E84) 23d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84)
23d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score80/100
BMW X1 (E84) 23d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | BMWX1 (E84)23d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 76.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,017km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,454mm175in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,585mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,525mm99in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 406L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84) 23d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 5,600 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | BMWX1 (E84)23d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 211 hp 157 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V Turbo has 7 hp more than BMW X1 (E84) 23d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 23d and Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V Turbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 6.3 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V Turbo and BMW X1 (E84) 23d: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.3 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)23d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo | BMWX1 (E84)23d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,017 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84) 23d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Forester II 2.5 i 16V Turbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X1 (E84) 23d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























