BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsBMW X1 (E84) 23d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (E84)
23d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW X1 (E84) 23d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (E84)23d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 76.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 1,017km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,454mm175in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,529mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 194mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,350L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (E84) 23d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (E84)23d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 204 hp 152 kW |
BMW X1 (E84) 23d has 12 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and BMW X1 (E84) 23d: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 23d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 864 km 537 mi |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 1,017 km 632 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)23d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (E84)23d |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (E84) 23d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (E84)23d | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (E84)23d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 1,017 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | BMW X1 (E84) 23d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
BMW X1 (E84) 23d
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























