BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0vsBMW X3 M (F97) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 M (F97)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight296 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW X3 M (F97) Competition 3.0
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range619 km385 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 296hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 259hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 377Nm/t252lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 578km359mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,726mm186in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,393mm55in | 1,669mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,864mm113in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,600L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 239g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 M (F97) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,600-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.3 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 3.9 s |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 and BMW X3 M (F97) Competition 3.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 578 km 359 mi |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | BMWX3 M (F97)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 578 km 359 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 239 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 | BMW X3 M (F97) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 M (F97) Competition 3.0
- Has 41 km (25 mi) more estimated range
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























