Car comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8vsBMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017

R 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2017-2018
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

GTS 3.0

500 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2016-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    199 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    706 km
    439 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    300 km/h
    186 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Highest torque
    680 Nm
    502 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    333 hp/t
    249 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
550hp410kW
500hp373kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,650kg3,638lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight-
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
60.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
55.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
3.8s
0-200 km/h
11.9s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
333hp/t249kW/t151hp/1000 lb
Calculated
331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton
Calculated
397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
654km407mi
Calculated
706km439mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,470mm176in
4,689mm185in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,314mm52in
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,596mm63in
Rear track
1,627mm64in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance-
108mm4in
Trunk volume
315L
445L
Max trunk volume
407L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
255g/km
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
3.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.9 s
11.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
201 km/h
125 mph
204 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
500 hp
373 kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 has 50 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V84.2 s
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.03.8 s

Although Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 has more power, BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
654 km
407 mi
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
706 km
439 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
500 hp
373 kW
3.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,314 mm
51.7 in
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
4.2 s
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
3.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
500 hp
373 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,314 mm
51.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
654 km
407 mi
706 km
439 mi
CO2 score
255 g/km
199 g/km
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
333 hp/t
249 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 130 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 56 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
GTS 3.0
CSL 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
GTS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8
GTS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleR 5.0 V8
GTS 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
R 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
GTS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
GTS 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2017 R 5.0 V8 vs BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster