BMW M4 Convertible (F83)
Car comparison
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0vsRolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe · Facelift 2012 6.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe · Facelift 2012
6.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t184 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range659 km410 mi
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score82/100
Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Highest torque720 Nm531 lb-ft
- Largest trunk395 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 720Nm531lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 2,630kg5,798lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 95.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.4s Calculated | 25.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 659km410mi Calculated | 541km336mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 5,612mm221in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,566mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 3,320mm131in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,686mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,676mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 220L | 395L |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | 347g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 5,350 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.4 s | 25.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12 has 29 hp more than BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 2,630 kg 5,798 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 5.8 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12 has more power, BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12: 5.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 659 km 410 mi |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 541 km 336 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 460 hp 343 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Rolls-RoycePhantom Drophead CoupeFacelift 20126.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 2,630 kg 5,798 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 659 km 410 mi | 541 km 336 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | 347 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 | Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Is 880 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 71 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 134 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe Facelift 2012 6.7 V12
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 175 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























