BMW M4 Convertible (F83)
Car comparison
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0vsRolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Dawn
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t184 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best economy score82/100
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Most powerful601 hp448 kW
- Highest torque840 Nm620 lb-ft
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 601hp448kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 840Nm620lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 2,560kg5,644lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.4s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 22.9L/100 km10.3mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 659km410mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,502mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 3,112mm123in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,665mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 220L | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | 337g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,650-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.4 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 601 hp 448 kW |
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has 170 hp more than BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 170 hp (127 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 4.9 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has more power, BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 5.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 601 hp 448 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 601 hp 448 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 659 km 410 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | 337 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 | Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Is 810 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 124 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Has 170 hp more
- Has 290 Nm more
- Has 101 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























