Porsche 718 Boxster (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5vsBMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 Convertible (F83)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions184 g/km
- Best estimated range790 km491 mi
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best economy score85/100
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 431hp321kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 61.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 790km491mi Calculated | 659km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,280mm50in | 1,386mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 220L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 184g/km | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 1,900-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 has 81 hp more than Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: 81 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 4.6 s |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 4.6 s |
Although BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 has more power, Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 790 km 491 mi |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 659 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 431 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 790 km 491 mi | 659 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 184 g/km | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 131 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Has 81 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























