Morgan Aero 8 · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Morgan Aero 8 · Facelift 2015 4.8 V8vsBMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 Convertible (F83)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range659 km410 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed273 km/h170 mph
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight311 hp/t232 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 431hp321kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,180kg2,601lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.6s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated | 61.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 311hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 415Nm/t278lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | 659km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,799cc293cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,147mm163in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,248mm49in | 1,386mm55in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 220L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 256g/km | 213g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 6,300 rpm | - | 6,550 rpm |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 16.4 s |
| Top speed | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 has 64 hp more than Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: 64 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 4.5 s |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 4.6 s |
Although BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 has more power, Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 311 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 659 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.5 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | 311 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MorganAero 8Facelift 20154.8 V8 | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 431 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | 659 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 256 g/km | 213 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 311 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8 | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Morgan Aero 8 Facelift 2015 4.8 V8
- Is 570 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Has 64 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























