HSV Clubsport (VE)
Car comparison
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8vsBMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (E90)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed288 km/h179 mph
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score75/100
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 418hp312kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.4s99% target: 285 km/h / 177 mph Calculated | 59.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 16.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 508km316mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,467mm58in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 has 2 hp more than HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
Although BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 has more power, HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW | 4.9 s | 288 km/h 179 mph |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 418 hp 312 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 288 km/h 179 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 508 km 316 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 46 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























