HSV Clubsport (VE)
Car comparison
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8vsBMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (E90)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Fastest top speed282 km/h175 mph
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score75/100
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 418hp312kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.7s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 15.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 228hp/t170kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,467mm58in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,915mm115in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,592mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 has 2 hp more than HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8 and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 and HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | 418 hp 312 kW | 4.8 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HSVClubsport (VE)R8 6.0 V8 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 418 hp 312 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
HSV Clubsport (VE) R8 6.0 V8
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 46 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























