Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32VvsBMW M3 (E36) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (E36)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score77/100
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful336 hp251 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range611 km379 mi
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 336hp251kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km379mi Calculated | 564km350mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,696mm67in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,365mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,502mm59in | 1,438mm57in |
| Max trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 183 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 336 hp 251 kW |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V has 15 hp more than BMW M3 (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
Although Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V has more power, BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 611 km 379 mi |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 336 hp 251 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 336 hp 251 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 379 mi | 564 km 350 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V | BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























