BMW M3 (G80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0vsBMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E92)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t210 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range546 km339 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score74/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 15.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t210kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 546km339mi Calculated | 508km316mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,615mm182in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,424mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (G80) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-6,130 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0 has 60 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and BMW M3 (G80) 3.0: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 4.2 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (G80) 3.0 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (G80) 3.0 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 546 km 339 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 508 km 316 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 546 km 339 mi | 508 km 316 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (G80) 3.0 | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Is 125 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























