Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E92)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Best estimated range531 km330 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 53.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 14.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 531km330mi Calculated | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,615mm182in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 430L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 440 hp 328 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has 20 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has more power, BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 531 km 330 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 529 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 440 hp 328 kW | 4.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V |
| 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 531 km 330 mi | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 28.35 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 45.62 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,430 L642 US gal535 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,253 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 km (1 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 170 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























