Venturi 300
Car comparison
Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 AtlantiqvsBMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E36)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range652 km405 mi
- Best performance score69/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Most powerful321 hp239 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 282hp210kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 652km405mi Calculated | 564km350mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,975cc182cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,240mm167in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,710mm67in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,335mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,444mm57in |
| Ground clearance | - | 110mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 405L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 5,300 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 282 hp 210 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 has 39 hp more than Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq.
The biggest power difference is between Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 5.3 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
Although BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 has more power, Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 and Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 652 km 405 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 282 hp 210 kW | 5.3 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Venturi3003.0 i V6 Atlantiq | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 282 hp 210 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 652 km 405 mi | 564 km 350 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Venturi 300 3.0 i V6 Atlantiq
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Has 39 hp more
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























