BMW M3 Coupe (E36)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2vsMercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C140)
CL 500 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful321 hp239 kW
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score77/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 321hp239kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,600kg5,732lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 115.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.8s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 22.1L/100 km10.6mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 564km350mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,201cc195cu in | 4,973cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 1,710mm67in | 1,912mm75in |
| Height | 1,335mm53in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,444mm57in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 505L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.8 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 107 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
| 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 321 hp 239 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 564 km 350 mi | 649 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 26.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 43.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 4,043 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 620 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























