BMW M3 (F80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0vsBMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E36)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score73/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 564km350mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,710mm67in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,335mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,444mm57in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | 110mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,380 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 has 139 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 and BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0: 139 hp (104 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 3.9 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 723 km 449 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 564 km 350 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0 | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (F80) CS 3.0
- Has 139 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 70 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Is 125 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























