BMW M3 (E90)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8vsBMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E36)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score73/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range564 km350 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,460kg3,219lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 529km329mi Calculated | 564km350mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,710mm67in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,335mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,444mm57in |
| Ground clearance | - | 110mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 405L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 has 99 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 99 hp (74 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 4.7 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 529 km 329 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 529 km 329 mi | 564 km 350 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
- Has 99 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.2
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























