BMW Z8 (E52)
Car comparison
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9vsBMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E93)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk210 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score42/100
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range503 km313 mi
- Best performance score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 18.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | 488km303mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,941cc302cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,400mm173in | 4,615mm182in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,317mm52in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 203L | 210L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 18.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 has 20 hp more than BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 4.7 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
Although BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 has more power, BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 503 km 313 mi |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 488 km 303 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | 488 km 303 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 203 L 7.2 cu ft | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 | BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























