BMW M3 (G80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0vsBMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E93)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted302 km/h188 mph Restricted
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best power-to-weight312 hp/t232 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range567 km353 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 65.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 18.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 567km353mi Calculated | 488km303mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,615mm182in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 210L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 350L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 18.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 has 130 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 and BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: 130 hp (97 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 567 km 353 mi |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 488 km 303 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 567 km 353 mi | 488 km 303 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 | BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Has 130 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























