Car comparison

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9vsBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW Z8 (E52)

4.9

400 hp4941 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2000-2005
VS

BMW M3 Convertible (E36)

3.2

321 hp3201 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1995-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    559 km
    347 mi
  • Largest trunk
    230 L
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    400 hp
    298 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    241 hp/t
    180 kW/t
    4.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWZ8 (E52)4.9BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
400hp298kW
321hp239kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
75.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
20.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
503km313mi
Calculated
559km347mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,941cc302cu in
3,201cc195cu in
Length
4,400mm173in
4,433mm175in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,710mm67in
Height
1,317mm52in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,505mm99in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,550mm61in
1,422mm56in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,444mm57in
Trunk volume
203L
230L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
73L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2PowerTorque
  • BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
  • BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWZ8 (E52)4.96,600 rpm3,800 rpm6,850 rpm
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.27,400 rpm3,250 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWZ8 (E52)4.9BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
20.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
180 km/h
112 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
321 hp
239 kW

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 79 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 79 hp (59 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.94.7 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.25.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
503 km
313 mi
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
559 km
347 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
400 hp
298 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
321 hp
239 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
4.7 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWZ8 (E52)4.9BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
400 hp
298 kW
321 hp
239 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
14.5 L/100 km
16.2 mpg US
19.5 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
203 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,317 mm
51.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
503 km
313 mi
559 km
347 mi
Trunk score
203 L
7.2 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
241 hp/t
180 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.38 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi40.84 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,806 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9

  • Has 79 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 27 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.9
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)650i
3.2
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2
4.9
4.0 V8
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
3.2
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 (E36)3.2
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (E64)Facelift 2007650i
3.2
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V
4.9
5.0 V10
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMWM6 Convertible (E64)5.0 V10
4.9
650i
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsBMW6 Series Convertible (F12)650i
3.2
2.3
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3
4.9
360 Spider
VS
BMWZ8 (E52)4.9vsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
3.2
2.5
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E30)2.5
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 vs BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 - car comparison - FastVsFaster