Panoz AIV Roadster
Car comparison
Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E36)
3.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful309 hp230 kW
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Lightest1,160 kg2,557 lb
- Best power-to-weight266 hp/t199 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score71/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk230 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 309hp230kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,160kg2,557lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 22.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 266hp/t199kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 351Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 2,990cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,040mm159in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,950mm77in | 1,710mm67in |
| Height | 1,190mm47in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,655mm105in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,700mm67in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,620mm64in | 1,444mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 230L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 7,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 22.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 309 hp 230 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 286 hp 213 kW |
Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32V has 23 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i and Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32V: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 4.6 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 266 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 186 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | 309 hp 230 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PanozAIV Roadster4.6 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 309 hp 230 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 266 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Panoz AIV Roadster 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 380 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 81 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.0i
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























