Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet
Car comparison
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E30)
2.3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km482 mi
- Largest trunk303 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque323 Nm238 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight194 hp/t145 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 323Nm238lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 194hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 775km482mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,405cc208cu in | 2,302cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,345mm171in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,680mm66in |
| Height | 1,235mm49in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,565mm101in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,414mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,435mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 303L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 6,750 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V has 85 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 and Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 6.3 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 and Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 194 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 723 km 449 mi |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 775 km 482 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.3 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 215 hp 160 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 194 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | BMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 775 km 482 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 303 L 10.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 194 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V | BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 93 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E30) 2.3
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 52 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























