BMW M2 (G87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0vsBMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M8 Coupe (F92)
Competition 4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Most powerful625 hp466 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight332 hp/t247 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best practicality score52/100
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted302 km/h188 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 625hp466kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,385kg5,258lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 37.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.7s | 10.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 11.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 332hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 382Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated | 398Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | 642km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,587mm181in | 4,867mm192in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,907mm75in |
| Height | 1,395mm55in | 1,362mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,747mm108in | 2,827mm111in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 390L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 420L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 242g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,730 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.7 s | 10.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 11.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 625 hp 466 kW |
BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8 has 95 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0 and BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 1,885 kg 4,156 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 3.8 s |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8 and BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0 and BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 520 km 323 mi |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 642 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 625 hp 466 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | BMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 625 hp 466 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,885 kg 4,156 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | 642 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 242 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0 | BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW M8 Coupe (F92) Competition 4.4 V8
- Has 95 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























