BMW M2 (G87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0vsBMW M4 (G82) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range546 km339 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 267hp/t199kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 531km330mi Calculated | 546km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,393mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,747mm108in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 (G87) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-5,870 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-6,130 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has 20 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 4.1 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 4.2 s |
Although BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 has more power, BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) 3.0: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 531 km 330 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 546 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 531 km 330 mi | 546 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 | BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























