BMW M2 (G87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 · Stage 3vsBMW M2 (G87) 3.0 · Stage 2vsBMW M2 (G87) 3.0 · Stage 1vsBMW M2 (G87) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 (G87)
3.0 (Stage 2)
BMW M2 (G87)
3.0 (Stage 1)
BMW M2 (G87)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed371 km/h231 mph
- Most powerful690 hp515 kW
- Highest torque853 Nm629 lb-ft
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight400 hp/t298 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range531 km330 mi
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 690hp515kW+230 hp | 598hp446kW+138 hp | 543hp405kW+83 hp | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 853Nm629lb-ft+303 Nm | 743Nm548lb-ft+193 Nm | 671Nm495lb-ft+121 Nm | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | 371 km/h 231 mph | 354 km/h 220 mph | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 367 km/h / 228 mph+35.0 s Calculated | 88.4s99% target: 350 km/h / 218 mph+38.8 s Calculated | 90.1s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph+40.6 s Calculated | 49.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s-0.9 s | 3.5s-0.6 s | 3.7s-0.4 s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.6s-3.9 s | 10.8s-2.7 s | 11.7s-1.8 s | 13.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.5s-0.4 s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s-1.2 s Calculated | 11.3s-0.8 s Calculated | 11.6s-0.5 s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 400hp/t298kW/t181hp/1000 lb Calculated | 347hp/t259kW/t157hp/1000 lb Calculated | 315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb Calculated | 267hp/t199kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 494Nm/t331lb-ft/ton Calculated | 430Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated | 389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 531km330mi Calculated | 531km330mi Calculated | 531km330mi Calculated | 531km330mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,580mm180in | 4,580mm180in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,887mm74in | 1,887mm74in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,403mm55in | 1,403mm55in | 1,403mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,747mm108in | 2,747mm108in | 2,747mm108in | 2,747mm108in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,617mm64in | 1,617mm64in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 123mm5in | 123mm5in | 123mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 390L | 390L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 52L | 52L | 52L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 2) 598 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 1) 543 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 460 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-5,870 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-5,870 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-5,870 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-5,870 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.3 s | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.6 s | 10.8 s | 11.7 s | 13.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 30.9 s | 39.6 s | 49.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 371 km/h 231 mph | 354 km/h 220 mph | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.3 s | 11.6 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 690 hp 515 kW |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 598 hp 446 kW |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 543 hp 405 kW |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 460 hp 343 kW |
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp has 230 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 460 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 460 hp and BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp: 230 hp (172 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 853 Nm 629 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 743 Nm 548 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 671 Nm 495 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 371 km/h 231 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 354 km/h 220 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 3.2 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 3.5 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 3.7 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp and BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 460 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 2) 598 hp and BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 1) 543 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 400 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 347 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 531 km 330 mi |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 531 km 330 mi |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 531 km 330 mi |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 531 km 330 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 690 hp 515 kW | 3.2 s | 371 km/h 231 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 598 hp 446 kW | 3.5 s | 354 km/h 220 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 543 hp 405 kW | 3.7 s | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | 400 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | 347 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 3)690 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 2)598 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 (Stage 1)543 hp | BMWM2 (G87)3.0460 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 690 hp 515 kW | 598 hp 446 kW | 543 hp 405 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 853 Nm 629 lb-ft | 743 Nm 548 lb-ft | 671 Nm 495 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 371 km/h 231 mph | 354 km/h 220 mph | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 531 km 330 mi | 531 km 330 mi | 531 km 330 mi | 531 km 330 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 400 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 347 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 2) 598 hp | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 1) 543 hp | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 460 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 3) 690 hp
- Has 92 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 (Stage 2) 598 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























