Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53vsBMW M2 (G87) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 (G87)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range639 km397 mi
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score72/100
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Lightest1,790 kg3,946 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449hp335kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,640kg5,820lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 49.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 12.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 639km397mi Calculated | 500km311mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,603mm63in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,747mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 123mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 390L |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 52L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 (G87) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,200-5,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 12.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 449 hp 335 kW |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 has 31 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 and BMW M2 (G87) 3.0: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 2,005 kg 4,420 lb |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 4.2 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 and BMW M2 (G87) 3.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 639 km 397 mi |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 500 km 311 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53 | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp 335 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,005 kg 4,420 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 639 km 397 mi | 500 km 311 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53 | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 53
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Has 31 hp more
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























