Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions199 g/km
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight265 hp/t198 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range711 km442 mi
- Best performance score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 365hp272kW | 370hp276kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 465Nm343lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 62.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 265hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 247hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,393mm173in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,286mm51in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 123mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 425L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 205g/km | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 1,900-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,400-5,560 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 365 hp 272 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 has 5 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 4.6 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 711 km 442 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 365 hp 272 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 365 hp 272 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 205 g/km | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 99 km (62 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























