BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0vsBMW X5 (F15) M50d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (F15)
M50d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 (F15) M50d
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions177 g/km
- Best estimated range1,269 km788 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight247 hp/t185 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,900kg6,393lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 247hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 1,269km788mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,886mm192in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,762mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,702mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 209mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,870L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 177g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (F15) M50d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,400-5,560 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 2,000-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 381 hp 284 kW |
BMW X5 (F15) M50d has 11 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and BMW X5 (F15) M50d: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 4.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 5.3 s |
Although BMW X5 (F15) M50d has more power, BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and BMW X5 (F15) M50d: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 (F15) M50d and BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 1,269 km 788 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.3 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 (F15) M50d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (F15)M50d | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | BMWX5 (F15)M50d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 1,269 km 788 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 177 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 247 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 | BMW X5 (F15) M50d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Is 695 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 74 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 (F15) M50d
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 275 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 657 km (408 mi) more estimated range
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























