Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque465 Nm343 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions185 g/km
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 365hp272kW | 370hp276kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 465Nm343lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 59.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t182kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,393mm173in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,286mm51in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 123mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 425L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 186g/km | 185g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,400-5,560 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 365 hp 272 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 has 5 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 4.3 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 4.3 s |
Although BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 has more power, Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 243 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 780 km 485 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 365 hp 272 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | 243 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 2.5 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 365 hp 272 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 186 g/km | 185 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 2.5
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 122 km (76 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























