BMW iX (I20)
Car comparison
BMW iX (I20) M60 111.5 kWhvsBMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 M (F96)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8
- Lightest2,295 kg5,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight261 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score79/100
BMW iX (I20) M60 111.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful619 hp462 kW
- Highest torque1,100 Nm811 lb-ft
- Best performance score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619hp462kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 1,100Nm811lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,584kg5,697lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Gross weight | 3,160kg6,967lb | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 48.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 13.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 261hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 426Nm/t285lb-ft/ton Calculated | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 654km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,953mm195in | 4,941mm195in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 2,019mm79in |
| Height | 1,696mm67in | 1,692mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 2,972mm117in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | 1,699mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,688mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 203mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 1,530L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 289g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 13.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | 619 hp 462 kW |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
BMW iX (I20) M60 111.5 kWh has 19 hp more than BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 and BMW iX (I20) M60 111.5 kWh: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | 2,584 kg 5,697 lb |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | 3.8 s |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW iX (I20) M60 111.5 kWh and BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | 619 hp 462 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWiX (I20)M60 111.5 kWh | BMWX6 M (F96)4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp 462 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,584 kg 5,697 lb | 2,295 kg 5,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 654 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 289 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW iX (I20) M60 111.5 kWh
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 350 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW X6 M (F96) 4.4 V8
- Is 289 kg lighter
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























