Land Rover Defender 110 (L663)
Car comparison
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635vsBMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW i5 Touring (G61)
M60 81.2 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Highest torque820 Nm605 lb-ft
- Lightest2,350 kg5,181 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Largest trunk786 L
- Best economy score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 601hp448kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 820Nm605lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Gross weight | 3,230kg7,121lb | 2,960kg6,526lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 32.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | - |
| Length | 5,003mm197in | 5,060mm199in |
| Width | - | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,995mm79in | 1,505mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,023mm119in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,773mm70in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,770mm70in | 1,625mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 323mm13in | 137mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 786L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,875L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | 601 hp 448 kW |
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635 has 34 hp more than BMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between BMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh and Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | 4.0 s |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | 3.9 s |
Although Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635 has more power, BMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh and Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | 635 hp 474 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | 601 hp 448 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)Octa 4.4 V8 P635 | BMWi5 Touring (G61)M60 81.2 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 601 hp 448 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | 2,350 kg 5,181 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 786 L 27.8 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) Octa 4.4 V8 P635
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 216 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
BMW i5 Touring (G61) M60 81.2 kWh
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























