BMW 8 Series (G15)
Car comparison
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850ivsBMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (F82)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight297 hp/t221 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions204 g/km
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 2,395kg5,280lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 53.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 297hp/t221kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 648km402mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,851mm191in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,346mm53in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,822mm111in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,627mm64in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 240g/km | 204g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 7,000 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 14.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 530 hp 395 kW |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i has 80 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0 and BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 3.7 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i and BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0 and BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 297 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 648 km 402 mi |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | 297 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW8 Series (G15)M850i | BMWM4 (F82)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 648 km 402 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 240 g/km | 204 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 297 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i | BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 8 Series (G15) M850i
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M4 (F82) Competition 3.0
- Is 375 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 36 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























