Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5vsBMW 8 Series (G15) 840i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 8 Series (G15)
840i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range932 km579 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | BMW8 Series (G15)840i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 69.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 17.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 932km579mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,843mm191in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,341mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,822mm111in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,627mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 150L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
- BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | BMW8 Series (G15)840i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 340 hp 254 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 has 10 hp more than BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 4.9 s |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 696 km 432 mi |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 932 km 579 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| BMW8 Series (G15)840i | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | BMW8 Series (G15)840i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 932 km 579 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 | BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 8 Series (G15) 840i
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
- Has 270 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























