Ferrari Testarossa
Car comparison
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48VvsBMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 8 Series (E31)
850Csi 5.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,009 km627 mi
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score76/100
BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 474Nm350lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,340kg5,159lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 21.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,009km627mi Calculated | 703km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,942cc302cu in | 5,576cc340cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,780mm188in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,130mm44in | 1,330mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,684mm106in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 320L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 115L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 5,300 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 21.1 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 167 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5.7 s |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,009 km 627 mi |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 703 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.7 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | BMW8 Series (E31)850Csi 5.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,900 kg 4,189 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,009 km 627 mi | 703 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V | BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 306 km (190 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
BMW 8 Series (E31) 850Csi 5.6
- Has 76 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























