Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6vsBMW 7 Series (G11) 750i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

BMW 7 Series (G11)

750i

450 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i

  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    940 km
    584 mi
  • Largest trunk
    515 L
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Most powerful
    471 hp
    351 kW
  • Lightest
    1,729 kg
    3,812 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    272 hp/t
    203 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6BMW7 Series (G11)750i
Power
471hp351kW
450hp336kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
1,729kg3,812lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight-
2,575kg5,677lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
41.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
241hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
348Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
940km584mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,673mm184in
5,098mm201in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,415mm56in
1,478mm58in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
3,070mm121in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,611mm63in
Rear track
1,536mm60in
1,640mm65in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
295L
515L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
78L
CO2 emissions-
194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6BMW 7 Series (G11) 750iPowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
BMW7 Series (G11)750i5,500-6,000 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6BMW7 Series (G11)750i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
12.9 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
195 km/h
121 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
450 hp
336 kW

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 has 21 hp more than BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V64.2 s
BMW7 Series (G11)750i4.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 4.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
241 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
940 km
584 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
450 hp
336 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
5,098 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,478 mm
58.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BMW7 Series (G11)750i
241 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6BMW7 Series (G11)750i
Power
471 hp
351 kW
450 hp
336 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.4 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
5,098 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,478 mm
58.2 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
940 km
584 mi
CO2 score
-
194 g/km
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
241 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Is 141 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i

  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 452 km (281 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 220 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
750i
750i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)750ivsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012750i
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
750i
750d
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)750ivsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019750d
V 3.6 V6
F 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
750i
750i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)750ivsBMW7 Series (F01)750i
V 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
750i
760i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)750ivsBMW7 Series (G70)760i
V 3.6 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
750i
760i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)750ivsBMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005760i
V 3.6 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017S 3.0 V6
750i
760i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)750ivsBMW7 Series (E65)760i
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 vs BMW 7 Series (G11) 750i - car comparison - FastVsFaster