Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7vsBMW 7 Series (F01) 750i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (F01)
750i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range689 km428 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Lightest1,990 kg4,387 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | BMW7 Series (F01)750i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Gross weight | 2,365kg5,214lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 54.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24L/100 km9.8mpg US11.8mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 201hp/t150kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 573km356mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 5,097mm201in | 5,072mm200in |
| Width | 1,885mm74in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,423mm56in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,064mm121in | 3,070mm121in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,611mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 148mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | BMW7 Series (F01)750i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 440 hp 328 kW |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 408 hp 304 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7 has 32 hp more than BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i and Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 2,030 kg 4,475 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 5.1 s |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 5.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i and Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 573 km 356 mi |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.1 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 408 hp 304 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (F01)750i | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte Sport GT S4.7 | BMW7 Series (F01)750i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | 2,030 kg 4,475 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 573 km 356 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 201 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7 | BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.49 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.24 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,357 L623 US gal518 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,124 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte Sport GT S 4.7
- Has 32 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 7 Series (F01) 750i
- Has 110 Nm more
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























