BMW 7 Series (E65) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
BMW 7 Series (E65) · Facelift 2005 745dvsVolkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Phaeton Long
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest2,040 kg4,497 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range978 km608 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8
- Most powerful335 hp250 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 335hp250kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Gross weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 978km608mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,423cc270cu in | 4,172cc255cu in |
| Length | 5,039mm198in | 5,175mm204in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,491mm59in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 3,001mm118in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,596mm63in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 3,800 rpm | 1,900-2,500 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 330 hp 246 kW |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 335 hp 250 kW |
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8 has 5 hp more than BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d and Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 6.6 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 6.9 s |
Although Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8 has more power, BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d and Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d and Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 978 km 608 mi |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 330 hp 246 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 335 hp 250 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | VolkswagenPhaeton Long4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 335 hp 250 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 978 km 608 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d | Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d
- Has 320 Nm more
- Is 350 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 285 km (177 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 4.2 V8
- Has 5 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























