Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32VvsBMW 7 Series (E38) 750i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E38)
750i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful336 hp251 kW
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Best power-to-weight204 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score77/100
BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 336hp251kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.3L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km379mi Calculated | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 5,379cc328cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,984mm196in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,502mm59in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 475L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 6,400 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 5,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 336 hp 251 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 326 hp 243 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V has 10 hp more than BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V and BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i and Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 611 km 379 mi |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 798 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 336 hp 251 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV3.2 V8 32V | BMW7 Series (E38)750i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 336 hp 251 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 379 mi | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V | BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 3.2 V8 32V
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 313 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i
- Has 40 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























