Jaguar XJ (X300)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V SportvsBMW 7 Series (E38) 750i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E38)
750i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque512 Nm378 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight171 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range798 km496 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 512Nm378lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km428mi Calculated | 798km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,980cc243cu in | 5,379cc328cu in |
| Length | 5,023mm198in | 4,984mm196in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,498mm59in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 5,000 rpm | 3,050 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 5,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 320 hp 239 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 326 hp 243 kW |
BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i has 6 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport and BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 6.3 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 6.6 s |
Although BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i has more power, Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport and BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i and Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 688 km 428 mi |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 798 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E38)750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | BMW7 Series (E38)750i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 428 mi | 798 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport | BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
- Has 22 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 7 Series (E38) 750i
- Has 6 hp more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 110 km (69 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























