Maserati Royale
Car comparison
Maserati Royale 4.9 V8vsBMW 7 Series (E32) · Facelift 1992 740i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E32) · Facelift 1992
740i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,790 kg3,946 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score75/100
Maserati Royale 4.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk600 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 392Nm289lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 756km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,930cc301cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,910mm193in | 4,910mm193in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,411mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,832mm111in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 600L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Royale 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 5,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i has 6 hp more than Maserati Royale 4.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Royale 4.9 V8 and BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 392 Nm 289 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 6.5 s |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 7.4 s |
Although BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i has more power, Maserati Royale 4.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Royale 4.9 V8 and BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | 286 hp 213 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiRoyale4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 392 Nm 289 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 756 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Royale 4.9 V8
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW 7 Series (E32) Facelift 1992 740i
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 8 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























