BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640dvsBMW X4 (G02) M40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 (G02)
M40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score79/100
BMW X4 (G02) M40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | BMWX4 (G02)M40d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,615kg5,765lb | 2,525kg5,567lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 351Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km661mi Calculated | 1,030km640mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,091mm200in | 4,752mm187in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,540mm61in | 1,621mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,070mm121in | 2,864mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,624mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,430L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 (G02) M40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | BMWX4 (G02)M40d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 107 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 320 hp 239 kW |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 326 hp 243 kW |
BMW X4 (G02) M40d has 6 hp more than BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d and BMW X4 (G02) M40d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 5.3 s |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X4 (G02) M40d and BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 1,065 km 661 mi |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 1,030 km 640 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 326 hp 243 kW | 4.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 (G02)M40d | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series Gran Turismo (G32)640d | BMWX4 (G02)M40d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 661 mi | 1,030 km 640 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d | BMW X4 (G02) M40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo (G32) 640d
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW X4 (G02) M40d
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























