BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0vsBMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)
650i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight331 hp/t247 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions199 g/km
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score84/100
BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range795 km494 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,865kg4,112lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,465kg5,434lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 706km439mi Calculated | 795km494mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 5,007mm197in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,968mm117in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,665mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 108mm4in | 126mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,265L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 206g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 15.9 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 has 50 hp more than BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i and BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 3.8 s |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 706 km 439 mi |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 795 km 494 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | BMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 706 km 439 mi | 795 km 494 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 206 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 | BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
- Has 50 hp more
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW 6 Series Gran Coupe (F06) 650i
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























